Gdańsk, PL
JUNE 12, 2026
We weren't cheering for the team.
The tournament is under way, and somewhere a bar has already lost the argument with its own furniture. This is a letter about what a World Cup really gives us — not the football, but the gathering around it.
By noon the corner bar has already lost the argument with its own furniture. Two tables that were never meant to touch have been shoved together, a third chair has appeared from nowhere, and someone is standing on a stool aiming a remote at a screen that won't tilt. The tournament kicked off on the eleventh. Nobody here is being paid to care this much.
And on your phone, a group chat that had gone quiet for weeks is suddenly awake. The fixtures land — a photo of a printed wall chart, corners already curling. Someone circles their team in red. Then the only question that actually matters, the one that has nothing to do with football: where are we watching?
This one is bigger than most. Three countries hosting at once — the United States, Canada and Mexico, the first World Cup ever split three ways — forty-eight teams instead of thirty-two, a hundred and four matches strung across a full month of evenings . It opened in Mexico City on the eleventh of June, under the old roar of the Estadio Azteca, and it won't finish until the nineteenth of July, at MetLife Stadium outside New York. Which is another way of saying: the excuse has never lasted longer, or reached further. A whole summer of standing invitations, handed out for free.
Because that is the trick a World Cup plays on us, and it is a generous one. For one month it hands everyone the same excuse at the same time. You don't have to invent a reason to text the friend you keep meaning to text. You don't have to explain why you're calling your dad on a Tuesday. There's a match. That's reason enough, and everyone already knows the rules.
We're not really watching the football
Or rather — the football is real, the goals are real, the heartbreak in the ninetieth minute is very real. But strip it back and what most of us are chasing is the shape of the evening around it. The same chairs. The friend who shouts at the referee as if he can hear. The cousin who texts one word after the goal. The ritual you don't have to organize, because the calendar organized it for you.
Watch how the ritual assembles itself. Someone shares the fixtures. Someone else claims a bar before anyone's asked. The reply-all begins — who's in, who's bringing whom, whether the new place has enough screens, whether the kickoff is too late for the ones with kids. Somebody dredges up the old joke from the last tournament, four years buried, and it lands as if no time has passed at all. By kickoff a plan has built itself out of nothing but a schedule and the wish to not be alone for it. None of that is about the sport. All of it is the point.
And notice how quickly everyone falls back into their old positions. The same person always ends up in the same seat, the one with the good angle on the screen. The same friend keeps up a running commentary nobody asked for and nobody would give up. The superstitious one refuses to move during a good spell, even to get another round. You didn't rehearse any of this. It's muscle memory from tournaments past — a little civilisation that rebuilds itself, unchanged, every few years, the moment the fixtures drop.
Anthropologists have a plainer name for what you are watching rebuild itself: a ritual. And rituals, it turns out, are not idle. Wire fans up through the buildup before kickoff and it is the shared, sensory-rich part — the chants, the flares, the crush of bodies moving as one — that spikes emotional synchrony hardest of the whole day, higher even than the goals . A crowd doing the same thing at the same time is not decoration around the match. It is the machine that turns a hundred separate people into one held breath .
There's a reason the whole planet leans toward the same screen. Around five billion people engaged with the last World Cup — and the number matters less than what it is made of: not one enormous crowd, but hundreds of millions of small rooms, each with the same picture on the wall, each with its own people crowded in.
A French sociologist gave this feeling a name more than a century ago. Émile Durkheim called it collective effervescence — the charge that leaps between people the moment a crowd assembles and acts as one, an energy no single person carries home alone but everyone feels while it lasts. He was describing tribal gatherings around a fire. He could just as easily have been describing a bar at kickoff.
Watching together does something to us that watching alone doesn't. You feel the room lift a half-second before you've understood the pass. A stranger grabs your shoulder and for ninety minutes you are, absurdly and completely, on the same side. That is belonging, delivered ready-made — and it happens to be exactly the thing the long research on human health keeps circling back to.
This is not a soft claim, and it is not only sentiment — it can be measured. Oxford anthropologists studying football supporters describe something deeper than a favourite club: a visceral sense of oneness with the group, the kind of fusion that welds strangers in the same colours into something closer to family and holds them loyal for life . Widen the lens and the pattern holds across cultures and methods — from team loyalty to live crowds to club sport, the through-line is always the company, not the game .
You know this in your body long before any study confirms it. Think of the goal you've watched alone, on a delay, already knowing it went in — and how flat it landed. Then think of the same goal in a packed room, the half-second of collective held breath, the roar that arrives from everyone at once and goes straight through you. Same footage. Utterly different event. The difference was never the pixels; it was the people.
And it shows up in the body. People who share an experience with someone else — without exchanging a single word — feel it more intensely than those who go through it alone; both the sweet and the bitter are amplified by company . Widen it once more and the finding repeats on different continents: a surge of shared feeling that tracks with group identity , well-being that outlasts the day itself , connection that reaches far past the room . Different rituals, one result — we are wired to feel more, together.
Good relationships keep us happier and healthier. Period.— Robert Waldinger, director of the Harvard Study of Adult Development — TED, 2015
The Harvard Study of Adult Development has followed people's lives for over eighty years, and its headline finding is almost embarrassingly simple: it isn't money or fame that keeps us well over a lifetime — it's the warmth of our connections . And it isn't only a matter of mood. Stronger social ties come with a markedly higher likelihood of survival — an effect on mortality researchers place ahead of obesity .
The Tuesday nobody circled
Two weeks in, the ritual has a shape. It's a group-stage match on a weeknight, two teams you have no stake in, the kind of fixture you'd have skipped in any other June. And yet the same chairs are filling. The friend who moved away has taken the night off and driven back in, the way she said she never would for a work thing but somehow does for this. Your dad texts at halftime to argue about a substitution, and you text back, and that back-and-forth is the whole conversation you've been failing to have for months, smuggled in under a formation. Nobody planned a party. It assembled itself again, the way it has all month, around ninety minutes that don't, on paper, matter to any of you.
That's the thing worth noticing before it slips past: how little the actual result had to do with why the room was full. You will not remember the score of that Tuesday match. You will remember that the room was warm, and who was in it, and that for once nobody had to be talked into coming.
Keep the excuse
So use the month for what it's actually good for. Send the fixtures to the friend who moved away. Claim a match to watch with your parents. Let the group chat pick a place and go, even if you don't know the offside rule, even if you're only there for the crisps and the noise. Say yes to the weeknight game. Be the one who circles the Tuesday nobody else did.
There's a strange grief in the days after a final, out of all proportion to a game. The group chat goes quiet again. The bar untangles its tables and gives the third chair back to whatever table it was stolen from. The wall chart comes down, every box finally filled in. What you're actually mourning isn't the football. It's the easy, unquestioned reason to be in a room with the people you love — the reason that, for one month, you never had to justify.
So when it ends in July — because it will end, someone will lift the trophy at MetLife and the noise will drain out of the streets — notice how easy the gathering was while the excuse existed. Then do the small, brave thing: keep the excuse. Pick a Tuesday with no match on it. Text the fixtures-less group anyway. Drag the tables together for no reason at all. The whistle was never the point. The people who came running when they heard it were.
Want to support Lieto? Subscribe and get every new letter.
- Peer-reviewed journal
- Psychology
- [6]Rochelle M. Eime, Janet A. Young, Jack T. Harvey, Melanie J. Charity, Warren R. Payne (2013). A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for adults: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 10, 135. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-135 [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- [7]Erica J. Boothby, Margaret S. Clark, John A. Bargh (2014). Shared Experiences Are Amplified. Psychological Science 25(12), 2209-2216. doi:10.1177/0956797614551162 [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- [8]José J. Pizarro, Larraitz N. Zumeta, Pierre Bouchat, Anna Włodarczyk, Bernard Rimé, Nekane Basabe, Alberto Amutio, Darío Páez (2022). Emotional processes, collective behavior, and social movements: A meta-analytic review of collective effervescence outcomes during collective gatherings and demonstrations. Frontiers in Psychology 13, 974683. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974683 [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- Medicine & health
- [5]Helen Keyes, Sarah Gradidge, Nicola Gibson, Annelie Harvey, Shyanne Roeloffs, Magdalena Zawisza, Suzanna E. Forwood (2023). Attending live sporting events predicts subjective wellbeing and reduces loneliness. Frontiers in Public Health 10, 989706. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.989706 [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- [11]Julianne Holt-Lunstad, Timothy B. Smith, J. Bradley Layton (2010). Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review. PLOS Medicine 7(7), e1000316. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- Natural sciences
- [1]Dimitris Xygalatas, Vitor Leandro da Silva Profeta, Mohammadamin Saraei, Gabriela Baranowski-Pinto (2025). Route of fire: Pregame rituals and emotional synchrony among Brazilian football fans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 122(24), e2422779122. doi:10.1073/pnas.2422779122 [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- [2]Ronald Fischer, Dimitris Xygalatas, Panagiotis Mitkidis, Paul Reddish, Penny Tok, Ivana Konvalinka, Joseph Bulbulia (2014). The Fire-Walker's High: Affect and Physiological Responses in an Extreme Collective Ritual. PLOS ONE 9(2), e88355. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088355 [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- [3]Martha Newson, Michael Buhrmester, Harvey Whitehouse (2016). Explaining Lifelong Loyalty: The Role of Identity Fusion and Self-Shaping Group Events. PLOS ONE 11(8), e0160427. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160427 [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- [4]Gi-Yong Koo, Junmo Sung, J. Michael Martinez (2015). Effects of Team Identification on Social and Emotional Adjustment in Higher Education. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport 8(2), 247-265. doi:10.1123/jis.2014-0081 [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- [9]Shruti Tewari, Sammyh Khan, Nick Hopkins, Narayanan Srinivasan, Stephen Reicher (2012). Participation in Mass Gatherings Can Benefit Well-Being: Longitudinal and Control Data from a North Indian Hindu Pilgrimage Event. PLOS ONE 7(10), e47291. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047291 [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- [10]Briar Irving, Christopher Kavanagh, Ronald Fischer, Masaki Yuki (2024). Dance for the dead: The role of top-down beliefs for social cohesion and anxiety management in naturally occurring collective rituals. PLOS ONE 19(3), e0291655. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291655 [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- Data / statistics
- [12]FIFA (2023). One Month On: 5 billion engaged with the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022. FIFA press release (Africa Newsroom open mirror) [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- Organisation / think tank
- [13]The Cigna Group (2020). Cigna 2020 U.S. Loneliness Index. Cigna (MultiVu press distribution) [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- Media
- [14]Robert Waldinger (2015). What makes a good life? Lessons from the longest study on happiness. TED [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- [15]Liz Mineo (2017). Good genes are nice, but joy is better. The Harvard Gazette [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- Book
- [16]Émile Durkheim (trans. Joseph Ward Swain) (1915). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. George Allen & Unwin, London [accessed: 2026-07-07]
- Other
- [17]Wikipedia contributors (2026). 2026 FIFA World Cup. Wikipedia [accessed: 2026-07-07]